OpenAI tipped to become the world’s first trillion-dollar privately-held startup by former Google China president

Imagine a 3:2 positive and light-hearted digital illustration representing the monumental prediction for OpenAI becoming the first trillion-dollar private startup. The key elements in the artwork include an AI symbol, similar to a brain or neural network, glistening like a diamond to symbolize the hefty price tag. There's also a small rocket to represent quick rise and growth. The background should suggest futuristic technology, perhaps a pattern resembling circuitry or data flow. Two people are discussing this development, a short-haired East Asian man and a mixed-race woman with curly hair, conveying diverse perspectives. Please abstain from direct Pixar style imitation.

Former Google China president Kai-Fu Lee predicts that OpenAI, established as a competitor to Google’s DeepMind, could become the world’s first trillion-dollar privately held startup. Despite being valued at over $80 billion, Lee believes OpenAI’s optimal balance between performance and cost makes its GPT-4 language model the superior commercial product. He anticipates that OpenAI could reach the trillion-dollar mark within two to three years, emphasizing the company’s remarkable execution and potential. Lee also criticizes OpenAI’s decision to stop publishing its research, a practice still followed by his company 01.AI. He highlights the significance of artificial intelligence, asserting that AI will surpass the impact of personal computers, the internet, and even electricity by a factor of 10. Lee expresses a strong desire to invest in OpenAI, emphasizing the extraordinary potential for a tenfold increase in its value. Additionally, he acknowledges the promise of other large language models but maintains that GPT-4 remains the gold standard even a year after its launch. Overall, Lee’s bullish outlook on OpenAI’s future underscores the company’s potential to achieve unprecedented success in the AI industry.

Full article

Leave a Reply